Aerospace engineering · University of Florida

Engineering for the
edge of possibility.

I'm an aerospace engineering master's student focused on launch vehicles, trajectory optimization, aerodynamics, and computational analysis.

SCROLL TO EXPLORE

01 — Profile

Turning complex physics into
clear engineering decisions.

I work across the boundary of analysis and design—using computation to understand trade spaces, test assumptions, and make aerospace systems perform.

M.S.Aerospace Engineering
University of Florida

02 — Selected work

Built from first principles.

Focused studies spanning vehicle design, atmospheric flight, numerical methods, and probabilistic modeling.

0134.08°

Optimal Control · Entry Dynamics

Reusable vehicle crossrange

Optimized a constrained reusable-launch-vehicle entry trajectory with LGR collocation, maximizing terminal crossrange while satisfying heating, load, and flight-path limits.

Project briefing
02−75%

Finite Elements · Verification

Thermal & structural FEA

Compared 2D and 3D thermal and structural finite-element models, measuring how mesh density, symmetry, and element order affect convergence, accuracy, and computational cost.

Project briefing
03MARS

Mission Design · Systems Engineering

Cosmic Coven Mars mission

Designed the technical architecture for a robotic Mars mission, including the interplanetary transfer, 180-day aerobraking campaign, science orbit, and spacecraft structural loads.

Project briefing
04−17%

Experimental Aerodynamics · XFOIL

Leading-edge icing wind tunnel

Designed and tested a 3D-printed NACA 65(2)-415 airfoil to quantify how simulated leading-edge rime ice changes lift, drag, and stall relative to clean and XFOIL baselines.

Project briefing
05R² .926

V&V · Uncertainty Quantification

Bayesian model verification

Calibrated competing drag models with Bayesian inference, then used posterior predictive checks to determine which formulation best represents the experimental fall-time data.

Project briefing
066.145 km/s

GNC · NASA Flight Data

DART optical navigation

Processed NASA SPICE flight products and developed an optical-navigation EKF, zero-effort-miss guidance analysis, and Monte Carlo study around DART's reconstructed terminal approach.

Project briefing
Also in the archive

Two-stage rocket design · Kriging analysis

Case study 01 — Mission design

Cosmic Coven:
a complete Mars mission architecture.

As a primary technical contributor, I developed the interplanetary transfer, Mars aerobraking and orbital strategy, and critical spacecraft structures for a multi-vehicle robotic survey mission.

Team systems design · University of Florida
MISSION OVERVIEW / 01:30PLAY PRESENTATION ↑
My technical focusTrajectory · Aerobraking · Structures
Transfer5.9 km/s

minimum modeled ΔV

Transit≈250 days

Earth-to-Mars transfer

Aerobraking180 days

to polar science orbit

Fatigue life10,508

cycles vs. 400 required

01

Interplanetary transfer

Built a MATLAB departure-arrival trade space and porkchop plot for the 2028–2029 window, identifying an approximately 250-day minimum-energy transfer.

02

Aerobraking & orbit

Defined the highly elliptical capture and 180-day aerobraking campaign leading to a 400 km polar science orbit with greater than 75% surface coverage.

03

Spacecraft structures

Sized the solar-array boom for peak atmospheric drag, then evaluated bending, shear, fatigue life, and fracture tolerance across the aerobraking campaign.

Case study 02 — Optimal control

Maximizing crossrange through atmospheric entry.

I transcribed a nonlinear reusable-launch-vehicle entry problem with single-mesh Legendre-Gauss-Radau collocation, then solved the resulting constrained nonlinear program in MATLAB.

Outcome34.0811°

terminal crossrange

Validation−0.243%

relative to GPOPS-II

Model247

decision variables

  • Six-state nonlinear entry dynamics
  • Free final time with terminal constraints
  • Independent RK4 re-integration
  • Physical bounds to avoid local minima
Ground track from the reusable launch vehicle crossrange optimization report
FIG / 11 Optimized latitude-longitude ground track

Case study 03 — Finite elements

Testing when a simpler model is still the right model.

I compared full, symmetry-reduced, 2D, and 3D finite-element models for steady-state conduction and structural compression, isolating the effects of mesh density, element order, and boundary conditions.

Reduction75%

via quarter symmetry

Thermal58.33°C

converged exterior peak

Structural35.33 MPa

quarter-model peak stress

  • Thermal and linear-elastic studies
  • Coarse-to-fine mesh convergence
  • Linear vs. quadratic tetrahedra
  • Plane-stress validity assessment
Fine-mesh thermal finite element temperature distribution from the project report
FIG / 25 Fine-mesh temperature distribution

Case study 04 — Experimental aerodynamics

Measuring how leading-edge ice changes stall.

I helped design, fabricate, and test a 3D-printed NACA 65(2)-415 airfoil, comparing the clean configuration with simulated rime ice in a calibrated wind-tunnel experiment and against an XFOIL baseline.

Max lift−17%

0.968 clean to 0.803 iced

Max drag+16%

0.474 clean to 0.551 iced

Stall2° earlier

12° clean to 10° iced

  • Reynolds number ≈198,000
  • Calibrated lift and drag measurements
  • 0°–16° angle-of-attack sweep
  • Monte Carlo and RSS uncertainty analysis
Measured lift coefficient for the clean and simulated-rime-ice airfoil configurations
EXPERIMENT Clean and iced lift response with uncertainty

Case study 05 — V&V and uncertainty

Calibrating a drag model—and testing whether it predicts.

I used experimental paper-helicopter drop data to select a physics model, quantify aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, calibrate its drag coefficient, and test out-of-sample predictive performance.

Model fitR² 0.926

linear drag model

Calibration50,000

posterior samples

Prediction0.0049

3-clip area metric

  • Linear vs. quadratic drag selection
  • Bayesian parameter calibration
  • 95% posterior predictive P-boxes
  • ECDF discrepancy area metrics
Posterior predictive probability box compared with the experimental fall-time distribution
PREDICTION P-box bounds and experimental ECDF

Case study 06 — Guidance and navigation

Reconstructing DART's final approach—and estimating the miss.

I processed NASA's archived DART and Dimorphos SPICE states to reconstruct the final ten minutes of flight, projected the 3D J2000 trajectory into an encounter plane, and built a simulated optical-navigation system around that flight-derived truth.

Flight data3,685 km

terminal approach window

EKF error26.9 m

median at 10 s cutoff

Predicted miss23.2 m

100-case median

  • NASA PDS SPICE flight products
  • 3D J2000 encounter-plane projection
  • Optical-navigation extended Kalman filter
  • Zero-effort-miss guidance and Monte Carlo
NASA DART reconstructed terminal trajectory compared with the simulated optical-navigation EKF estimate
FLIGHT DATA NASA SPICE trajectory and EKF convergence

03 — Resume

Engineering depth,
grounded in computation.

Download resume
Education

M.S. Aerospace Engineering

University of Florida · Expected December 2026

3.95 / 4.00 GPACertificates in Scientific Computing and Control Systems
Foundation

B.S. Aerospace Engineering

University of Florida · 2025

Computer Science minorNational Merit Scholar · Dean's List
Technical toolkit
Code

Python · MATLAB · C++

Analysis

Abaqus · SolidWorks · LabVIEW

Focus

GNC · FEA · Optimal control · V&V / UQ

04 — Capabilities

01Flight dynamics
02Aerodynamics
03Optimization
04Finite element analysis
05Uncertainty quantification
06Scientific computing
07Guidance & navigation